(I had no idea what to title this post.)
Peter Kafka, reporting for Recode earlier this year, re: Verizon shuttering relatively large services they've purchased over the years rather than "bothering" to sell them off (like they did with Flickr):
So if Verizon thinks a property with 100 million users is better off dead than sold, think of all the other random properties it might have slated for the deadpool.
A revealing tidbit in this is K. Guru Gowrappan regretting the sale of Flickr because it took too long and was too expensive of a transaction. I'm glad they did. I want Flickr to continue to exist and I'm sure there are millions more that would too.
Large companies are not good homes for beloved services. We are living in an age of the internet where if a service isn't at hundreds-of-millions of users and throwing off tons of profit they simply aren't worth the time for companies the size of Verizon or Google. Both of these companies have enormous cemeteries in their backyards of things they've built or bought and shuttered regardless of their usage or loyal users.
Over the last year I've moved my use of platforms, services, or products to things I can control long term or are open source. Examples include my photo management process no longer being reliant on the cloud, my content all being on my own domain, and my site being on my own infrastructure. I still have more work to do but I want to future proof as much of the stuff I care about as I can.