<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cdevroe.com &#187; the happening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/tag/the-happening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com</link>
	<description>by Colin Devroe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cdevroe.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='cdevroe.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Not quite a review of The Happening</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/review-happening/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/review-happening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m. knight shyamalan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spoilers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the happening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A review that isn't a review, really, but is - of The Happening.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Orr &#8220;reviews&#8221; <em>The Happening</em> in a different way than we&#8217;re used to; by giving away spoilers on purpose.Â  His reason for doing so? Because he believes you shouldn&#8217;t have to see the movie in order to talk about how bad it was.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;M. Night Shyamalan&#8217;s latest movie, <em>The Happening</em>, is not merely bad. It is an astonishment, so idiotic in conception and inept in execution that, after seeing it, one almost wonders whether it was real or imagined. It&#8217;s the kind of movie you want to laugh about with friends, swapping favorite moments of inanity: &#8220;Do you remember the part when Mark Wahlberg &#8230; ?&#8221; &#8220;God, yes. And what about that scene where the wind &#8230; ?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem, of course, is that to have such a conversation, you&#8217;d normally have to <em>see</em> the movie, which I believe is an unreasonably high price to pay just to make fun of it. So rather than write a conventional review explaining why you should or shouldn&#8217;t see <em>The Happening</em> (trust me, you shouldn&#8217;t), I&#8217;m offering an alternative: A dozen and a half of the most mind-bendingly ridiculous elements of the film, which will enable you to marvel at its anti-genius without sacrificing (and I don&#8217;t use that term lightly) 90 minutes of your life.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>His words, not mine.Â  Though with <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10007985-happening/">an average rating of 4.1</a> on the movie review Web site <a href="http://rottentomatoes.com/">Rotten Tomatoes</a>, perhaps he is right on the money.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.tnr.com/booksarts/story.html?id=75893f9a-3391-4ab5-88c8-cf7e74bcd835">The Movie Review: &#8216;The Happening&#8217;</a>.<br />
Hat tip: <a href="http://kyleslattery.com/">Kyle Slattery</a>, <a href="http://kottke.org/">Jason Kottke</a>, <a href="http://coudal.com/">Coudal Partners</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/review-happening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

