<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cdevroe.com &#187; knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/tag/knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com</link>
	<description>by Colin Devroe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cdevroe.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='cdevroe.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Great things take time. Details are everything.</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/abby-details/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/abby-details/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abby wagner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[context]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound bites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=5877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Abby wishes people would slow down and take the time needed to explain things. Details have such little value to many people. No one wants to hear the whole story, they just want you to get right to the point. [...] In my mind it would be helpful to explain how I arrived at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend <a href="http://abbyhann.blogspot.com/2012/04/details.html">Abby wishes people would slow down and take the time needed to explain things</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Details have such little value to many people. No one wants to hear the whole story, they just want you to get right to the point. [...] In my mind it would be helpful to explain how I arrived at a certain problem&#8230;but all that they want to hear is the ending.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sometimes the entire story is in the details. Context is everything. The fact that more and more people are getting used to getting entire stories from headlines, sound bites, and tweets means that people&#8217;s knowledge may very well be missing the most important parts. The details.</p>
<p>Abby continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230;I&#8217;m not sitting here disgruntled with all humans. It&#8217;s just my observation. Someone out there will listen to the details.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sadly this is a number that is shrinking rather than growing and I&#8217;m unsure if the trend is possible to counteract. More and more people would rather understand complex concepts by being told or learn how to cook recipes in less and less time. Great things take time. If you&#8217;re one of the few that appreciate that and you see yourself slipping into this trend, slow down, relax, and look at the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/abby-details/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not anymore Henry</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/knowledge-science-man/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/knowledge-science-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[henry david thoreau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting comparison between the knowledge of science and the knowledge of man by the always quotable Henry David Thoreau: &#8220;Science does not embody all that men know, only what is for men of science. The woodman tells me how he caught trout in a box trap, how he made his trough for maple sap of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting <a href="http://hdt.typepad.com/henrys_blog/2010/01/january-7-1851.html">comparison between the knowledge of science and the knowledge of man</a> by the always <a href="http://cdevroe.com/?s=henry+david+thoreau">quotable</a> Henry David Thoreau:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Science does not embody all that men know, only what is for men of science. The woodman tells me how he caught trout in a box trap, how he made his trough for maple sap of pine logs, and the spouts of sumach or white ash, which have a large pith. He can relate his facts to human life. The knowledge of an unlearned man is living and luxuriant like a forest, but covered with mosses and lichens and for the most part inaccessible and going to waste; the knowledge of the man of science is like timber collected in yards for public works, which still supports a green sprout here and there, but even this is liable to dry rot.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I also like the bit where he mentions that a lot of man&#8217;s knowledge ends up going to waste &#8211; presumably because it is lost with the man at death. Henry David Thoreau, though, didn&#8217;t live in a world with blogs and Twitter. If more people would spout out knowledge through these channels, <a href="http://cdevroe.com/videos/r60-stop-complaining/">instead of negativity</a>, I think Henry&#8217;s thoughts could be outdated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/knowledge-science-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chewing on bits, bites, and full on meals</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/reading-blogs-books/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/reading-blogs-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me, rambling about my reading habits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some prefer to eat three times a day. Â Breakfast. Lunch. Dinner. Â It seems that lately people in my country seem to skip the first meal, generally eat the second meal on-the-run or too quickly, and eat the last meal of the day far too late in the day.</p>
<p>Then you have the health conscious individuals that focus on eating smaller meals much more often. Â Proven to keep your metabolism ragingÂ throughoutÂ the day. Coupled with a good routine of exercise this is the sure-fire way to keep healthy and energetic.</p>
<p>But this post has nothing to do with food. Â It has to do with reading habits.</p>
<p>I love words. Reading them, writing them, seeing them crafted in ways that I can only aspire to. Â Because of this I read a lot. Â But I don&#8217;t read books (as often as I&#8217;d like). Â I read blogs, link lists, and tidbits of information strewn throughout the World Wide Web.</p>
<p>The link lists that I subscribe to are like little bits. Â Snacks, if you will. Â The really good ones will sum up entire articles in only a few sentences so that I&#8217;m not forced to read the entire linked-to-resource to find out why that person found it interesting. Â Really bad ones do the opposite.</p>
<p>The blogs that I subscribe to, in general, are well-written, hand-crafted, andÂ consistentlyÂ of high-quality, interesting information. Â The others are generally related to my work or things I&#8217;m interested in learning about. Â There are, also, the few that seem to fill in the cracks to make my subscription list more human and fun like photo blogs, blogs written by friends or family, and Web comics.</p>
<p>Lately I&#8217;ve been questioning my information in-take. Â What is better; reading these little bits of information rather than chewing on the whole meal, or maybe the other way around?</p>
<p>The more I think about it, the more I realize how new this dilemma is. Â Before the advent of the Internet the only way to get this much information at one time was to have a stack of books or magazines sitting in front of you, rifling through them as fast as your thumbs would allow, and reading a single paragraph from each page as you did it. Â You&#8217;d probably think someone doing that was crazy but that is exactly what it feels like I&#8217;m doing.</p>
<p>Have you ever spoken to someone who knows 20% about a topic? Â Sure they can hold their own in passing conversation about the topic so long as the conversation doesn&#8217;t last longer than 30 seconds. Â Once the conversation gets specific, the &#8220;20 percenter&#8221; is left standing there trying to catch up to the conversation and realizing they don&#8217;t know anything at all about the topic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think that unwittingly I&#8217;m going to end up being that person. Â A topic will arise at a gathering that I&#8217;ve read only four sentences about and I&#8217;ll answer the inevitable question of &#8220;Have you heard about (insert topic here)?&#8221; with a resounding &#8220;Yes!&#8221;. Â Then I&#8217;m caught. Â I&#8217;ve just stepped through the door of saying that I know something when I truly don&#8217;t. Â Well, yes, I&#8217;ve read four sentences about how the Mars-lander was able to take a solid, ice-like material, and turn it into water (H2O), but I know absolutely nothing more about the topic.</p>
<p>So what do I do? Â Stop reading link lists? Â Perhaps.</p>
<p>But then what about blogs? Â More often than not blog posts by friends, family, or even those related to the industry I work in do little more than entertain, catch me up on &#8220;the news&#8221;, or completely distract me from what I should be doing. Â Very, very rarely have I found a blog post to be wholly beneficial to have in my brain.</p>
<p>Think about it. Â When was the last time you remembered a blog post, in its entirety, to solve a problem you encountered. Â Right away you&#8217;re probably thinking about a problem you had with your iPhone, or some sort of electronic device, that you fixed because you read a blog post about it. Â That may be true. Â But couldn&#8217;t you have found that information by doing a quick Google search?</p>
<p>Since the Egyptians began beating up papyrus plants some 5,000+ years ago humans have used &#8220;books&#8221; ((Paper based products like scrolls, books, and loose-leaf paper included.)) so why should I be any different? Â I really enjoy reading books. Â The tangibleness of a book is much better than reading on-screen, which is part of it, but the other part is the wholeness of books. Â It is an entire work in one spot. Â Blog posts, for the most part, are just pieces of ideas and opinions about a given topic rather than an explanation about an entire topic. Â More often than not they take for granted the fact that the reader understands the topic being discussed (perhaps due to context or just because it is something that is considered general knowledge by the audience).</p>
<p>So do I unsubscribe from every-single-blog, shutdown my computer, and just go to a library every time I need to learn something? I&#8217;d say absolutely not. Â But I do think there is a balance and I&#8217;m going to work at striking it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/reading-blogs-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

