<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cdevroe.com &#187; daringfireball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/tag/daringfireball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com</link>
	<description>by Colin Devroe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cdevroe.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='cdevroe.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>The blog format is ready for disruption</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/blog-format-disruption/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/blog-format-disruption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trackback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=4793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent chatter about pagination on blog home pages has reminded me of the days when blogging was just getting underway. Back then there were a few pioneers that were testing the waters, experimenting with the designs and layouts of their sites, constantly trying to find the right set of features that a blog needed. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent chatter about pagination on blog home pages has reminded me of the days when blogging was just getting underway. Back then there were a few pioneers that were testing the waters, experimenting with the designs and layouts of their sites, constantly trying to find the right set of features that a blog needed.</p>
<p>And for the past few years I think this has settled down a little. The standards those few pioneers set in the beginning are still around. Most blogs today have a fairly similar feature-set and layout. Even when the layout is dramatically different than the status quo the feature-set is still just about the same.</p>
<p>I believe the blog format is ready for disruption. Perhaps there doesn&#8217;t need to be &#8220;the next&#8221; WordPress, Tumblr, or Blogger for this to happen. Maybe all we really need is a few pioneers to spearhead an effort to change the way blogs are laid-out on the screen. There are still so many problems to solve; how new readers and also long-time subscribers consume the stream of posts, how people identify with the content of the blog on the home page, how to see what the blog is all about, how to make money, how to share, and how interact and provide feedback on the content.</p>
<p>Several rather new trends are appearing in the pro blogosphere that started only a few years ago but are now becoming the new pro blog recipe. These trends simply weren&#8217;t there 7 or even 5 years ago. Disabling comments is seems to be the main dish (though <a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/benefit-disable-comments/">4 years ago it was debated</a>). Having a podcast on-the-side is the side-dish. Add to that some sponsorship opportunities in RSS feeds, and a sprinkling of an ad network to taste, and you&#8217;ve got yourself the modern day pro blog recipe. Actually, all you really have is a direct mirror of what John Gruber has put together with <a href="http://daringfireball.net">Daring Fireball</a> &#8211; but, nonetheless, these are the trends among pro bloggers and these must be taken into consideration when coming up with a brand new blog format that could set the trend for the next few years.</p>
<p>Syndication has also changed. It seems just yesterday that people thought full-content RSS feeds would destroy their ability to make money blogging. It turns out that could possibly be the most profitable part of their blog&#8217;s business model.</p>
<p>Having a Twitter account for your blog, or simply <a href="http://hypertext.net/2011/05/hypertext-on-twitter">being selective with what is tweeted</a> from your blog (which is my current model), is where things may very well be shifting. Today it would be unthinkable to see sponsored tweets in amongst the links to posts but give it a few years. Today&#8217;s Twitter feed is yesterday&#8217;s RSS feed. I imagine there will be sponsored tweets too and, in the near future, people will be just fine with that.</p>
<p>Exclusive, paid-for email newsletters had a spike earlier this year with a few services launching and some key figures in the industry taking a stab at them. I have no inside information on how those are turning out &#8211; but there is reason to believe that the blog could also do with some exclusive, paid-for content. It may not work for your blog about Hobbit-lore but perhaps it&#8217;d work for an incredibly good cooking, investing advice, <a href="http://designthencode.com/">design-and-code-tutorial</a>, or <a href="http://subscriptions.viddler.com/PREPARE_INC">architecture exam review</a> blog.</p>
<p>Something I&#8217;ve always had issue with is that there aren&#8217;t enough &#8220;home pages&#8221; on blogs. That is why <a href="http://cdevroe.com/">the home page for my site</a> is my about page rather than a reverse chronological list of posts as most blogs are. I have <a href="http://cdevroe.com/blog">that page too</a> but people landing directly on cdevroe.com should not be introduced to my website by only seeing the latest few posts I&#8217;ve written. It wouldn&#8217;t be a very good introduction and, very well, may not even represent what my blog is about. Because this is a personal blog and not a blog about any one topic, the latest few blog posts would be a very bad representation about what this site really is &#8211; a personal blog.</p>
<p>Most blogs that try to earn a buck want to put as many clickable items on their home pages as possible. They probably feel that if they didn&#8217;t you&#8217;d never go anywhere besides the home page. I can say, after pouring over the stastics of my home page, that isn&#8217;t true. A fair percentage of the people that have come to my home page have stayed on that page for a few moments (presumably reading the page) and subsequently clicked on the blog or diet page(s), done a search, or gone to my Twitter account. All good things. I hope that someone solves this issue in a much better way than I have because I really do believe there is a lot of room for improvement here.</p>
<p>Advertising on blogs has simply never worked well. Yes, publishers have made money. Yes, advertisers have increased sales by purchasing ad space on blogs. However, for the core-subscribers to a blog the ads are just noise. Ad networks like <a href="http://decknetwork.net/">The Deck</a> do a very good job at striving to keep a higher quality product by controlling the ads and how they are displayed. But, arguably, even at that level of curation we still just end up with an ad in a sidebar on a blog. I wish there was a better answer for making content &#8220;free&#8221; to blog subscribers but &#8211; at present &#8211; advertising is our mule.</p>
<p>Some people claim the trackback is dead. I don&#8217;t believe that to be true. In fact, I rather like trackbacks. I like when blogs show me what others have written about a particular blog post. I like them even better than comments. Perhaps if blog software, and the theme of a blog, used the optional excerpt of <a href="http://www.sixapart.com/pronet/docs/trackback_spec">the trackback standard</a> better they&#8217;d work much more like comments (and be much more valueable) than they do now.</p>
<p>Reblogging, Retweeting, Sharing/Liking on Facebook, etc. are all ways to have a post be spread outside of a blog&#8217;s audience. The modern day word of mouth. There is no doubt that these tools work very well for some blogs while on others they do nothing. I have these options on my blog and, while I do get a few people using them per day, they serve little purpose then to remind people that if they&#8217;d like to share the post they can do it quickly and easily. But in reality, if a post is simply too good not to pass on it will be passed on whether you have a big Facebook button on your blog or not. These tools aren&#8217;t going anywhere in fact they are going to become even more ubiquitous &#8211; but it&#8217;d be nice if someone with an ounce of taste figured out a way to make these options pretty as well as easy to use and, as a hat-trick, much more valuable to all parties involved.</p>
<p>I know, I know, I&#8217;m going on and on about this but all of the above is just the tip of the iceberg as to why I believe that the blog format is ripe for someone to really begin innovating again. We have all of the tools and over a decade&#8217;s worth of content &#8211; all we need are some pioneers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/blog-format-disruption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoping they get Multitouch Multitasking Gestures right in iPad</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/ios-gestures/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/ios-gestures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gestures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitasking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reeder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=4728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently chirped on Twitter that I would love to see Multitouch Multitasking Gestures on iPad ship by default. As it stands you have to turn Development Mode on using Xcode in order to use them. John Gruber quoted Guy English on the caveats to these gestures and while I agree they aren&#8217;t perfect &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="https://twitter.com/cdevroe/status/51633291958304768">recently chirped on Twitter</a> that I would love to see Multitouch Multitasking Gestures on iPad ship by default. As it stands you have to turn Development Mode on using Xcode in order to use them.</p>
<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2011/04/01/guytouch">John Gruber quoted Guy English</a> on <a href="http://kickingbear.com/blog/archives/92">the caveats to these gestures</a> and while I agree they aren&#8217;t perfect &#8211; I sure hope Apple doesn&#8217;t give up before they&#8217;ve made them good enough to include by default. I know I know, Apple doesn&#8217;t do anything &#8220;good enough&#8221;.</p>
<p>Since turning these gestures on for my iPad 2 (have I told you that I named it Hurley?) I have been using them extensively. In fact, the only application that <a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/ipad-apps/">I&#8217;ve come across</a> so far that has issue with them is <a href="http://reederapp.com/">Reeder</a>.</p>
<p>I do not think Apple should or will ever get rid of the Home button. But I do believe that these gestures make using the iPad much quicker. The hardware, such as processor and RAM, isn&#8217;t the issue of performance it is the controls. The iPad is plenty fast but having to find and double tap the Home button isn&#8217;t nearly as quick a four-finger swipe up or side-to-side. Here&#8217;s to hoping they get them right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/ios-gestures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good can come from squeezing Adobe.</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flash-mac-pressure/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flash-mac-pressure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uninstall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=4350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do I think about this recent &#8220;movement&#8221; to uninstall Flash? Glad you asked. I think it is great. Flash has certainly been a tool to help us get to where we are today and no one could argue with its ubiquity. It is a tool that was good enough to get the job done [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do I think about this recent <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/11/flash_free_and_cheating_with_google_chrome">&#8220;movement&#8221; to uninstall Flash</a>? Glad you asked.</p>
<p>I think it is great. Flash has certainly been a tool to help us get to where we are today and no one could argue with its ubiquity. It is a tool that was good enough to get the job done and pretty much everyone had it.</p>
<p>But tools have cost and some are more expensive than others. Flash has proved to be a bit too expensive on the Mac for some people. At the cost of performance and battery life &#8211; some would rather do without that particular tool and go with another one. One that costs less, seemingly has the same quality but maybe less features. HTML5 video playback, on most up-to-date Macs, outperforms Flash video playback in nearly every way except features. But, arguably, most every day uses for video do not need many features.</p>
<p>So why do I think it is great that so many are uninstalling Flash? Because there hasn&#8217;t been enough pressure on Adobe over the years to improve Flash&#8217;s performance on the Mac. Adobe has been updating Flash for years but (and this point is probably arguable) they&#8217;ve been worried less about performance on the Mac then they&#8217;ve been worried perhaps about features. They&#8217;ve spent more time making Flash do more instead of simply doing it better.</p>
<p>Apple started putting pressure on Adobe by releasing the iPhone without Flash. Apple never said Flash didn&#8217;t do anything useful &#8211; they simply pointed out what needed to be improved in Flash for it to run on the iPhone. Performance and stability were the two biggest complaints from Apple. The two things Adobe seemingly hadn&#8217;t been focused on. And Apple also thought Flash didn&#8217;t have very good interactions with a touch-based interface. Something Adobe could probably address rather easily.</p>
<p>With the success of both the iPhone and iPad obviously the guys at Adobe should have been striving pretty hard to make Flash run much better on these mobile devices. Obviously they haven&#8217;t done that or been able to accomplish that because &#8211; well, Flash still isn&#8217;t on the iPhone.</p>
<p>Then Apple decided that the new Macbook Air performs much better without Flash being installed and so they&#8217;ve left it out of this model by default. Something they learned from not having Flash on the iPhone and iPad. The new Macbook Air can boast a considerably longer battery life and better CPU performance simply because it does not have Flash installed.</p>
<p>Sure, many new Macbook Air owners will still install Flash the moment their browser tells them they don&#8217;t have it &#8211; but I&#8217;d bet they are selling boat loads of these Airs so there are still going to be a lot of people without Flash running around the Web.</p>
<p>This recent fad of Flash being uninstalled en masse by the Mac tech crowd, the Fireballers if I may, is simply the next squeeze on Adobe. Yet another reason for Adobe to step up and alleviate the reasons people are uninstalling Flash.</p>
<p>Put simply, if Flash didn&#8217;t cause our Macs to melt and our batteries to die this conversation wouldn&#8217;t be happening. The iPhone would have shipped with Flash, the iPad too, and we&#8217;d all be happy to have Flash installed on our Macs. But the truth is Flash really sucks on the Mac. And as a Macintosh user and someone who works for a company with a very big Flash product &#8211; I&#8217;m hoping that Adobe is being squeezed hard enough now to make something finally happen. To finally make Flash better on the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flash-mac-pressure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolfenstein 3D now on the iPhone, but wait, there&#8217;s more</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/wolfenstein-3d-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/wolfenstein-3d-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[id software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john carmack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfenstein 3d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[id Software recently released Wolfenstein 3D for the iPhone. This is fantastic news. The game that started the entire first-person shooter genre is now on the iPhone. But there is more. id is releasing the source code for the game. (See link at the bottom of this page.) And John Carmack, the brains behind nearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>id Software recently <a href="http://www.idsoftware.com/wolfenstein3dclassic/">released Wolfenstein 3D for the iPhone</a>. This is fantastic news. The game that started the entire first-person shooter genre is now on the iPhone.</p>
<p>But there is more.  id is releasing the source code for the game. (See link at the bottom of <a href="http://www.idsoftware.com/wolfenstein3dclassic/">this page</a>.) And John Carmack, the brains behind nearly every id project for the last several decades, <a href="http://www.idsoftware.com/wolfenstein3dclassic/wolfdevelopment.htm">wrote about his experiences with development on the iPhon</a>e.</p>
<p>Via: John Gruber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/wolfenstein-3d-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best of 2008 as told by me</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/best-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/best-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andy baio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connect 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hahlo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handshake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ichat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason-kottke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason-santa-maria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marsphoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netnewswire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocarina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the big picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A relatively short list of some of the best things I've found online this year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is only mid-November but I&#8217;m confident in my choices for this years &#8220;Best of 2008 as told by Colin Devroe&#8221;. This isn&#8217;t a list based on popularity,Â consensus, or a set of rules. They are simply works that I feel should be awarded with the recognition of being the best that I&#8217;ve personally found this year. Having been a geek since the age of 14 I feel that I&#8217;m expert enough to make this list. Besides, this is my site so eat it.</p>
<p>In no particular order I present &#8211; the best of the Web 2008.</p>
<h3>The Best Blog: <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a></h3>
<p>John Gruber&#8217;s blog will, it seems, always win this award from me. I toyed with the idea of awarding Daring Fireball with Best Journalism but I don&#8217;t want to take anything away from the writers that are writing about much more important topics than the goings-on of the Apple community and marketplace.</p>
<h3>The Best New Blog: <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/">The Big Picture</a></h3>
<p>Boston.com&#8217;s The Big Picture is easily the best new blog of 2008. Jason Kottke <a href="http://kottke.org/08/11/great-photos-of-obama">agrees with me</a>, or I agree with him maybe. The photos are always stunning and the topics always seem perfectly aligned with my particular interests at the time of publishing. Even though I&#8217;ve read <a href="http://waxy.org/2008/06/interview_with_alan_taylor_creator_of_boston_globes_the_big_picture/">Andy Baio&#8217;s interview with the author</a>, Alan Taylor, I still don&#8217;t know how this blog is asÂ consistentlyÂ awesome as it is.</p>
<h3>The Best Blog Redesign: <a href="http://jasonsantamaria.com/">Jason Santa Maria</a></h3>
<p>Jason&#8217;s latest redesign for his personal site is inspiring. Each of his posts, as he so choses, are designed specifically to empower the content he is posting. <a href="http://jasonsantamaria.com/articles/oh-snap/">Example</a>. <a href="http://jasonsantamaria.com/articles/meat-cheese-combo-proves-edible/">Example</a>. <a href="http://jasonsantamaria.com/articles/on-the-subject-of-design/">Example</a>. His site has made me rethink my random headers on this site and I&#8217;ve now begun development of a much more intelligent way to allow my site to choose the headers. And that is just a start. Jason&#8217;s blog is also one of the only blogs that I purposefully leave the Google Reader interface to read the article as he intends, on his site. Brilliant.</p>
<h3>The Best Blogging Platform: <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a></h3>
<p>My love for WordPress isn&#8217;t a secret. But <a href="http://automattic.com/">Automattic&#8217;s</a> effort to continue the momentum of this open source project has certainly been a big winÂ for it. Regular, scheduled, feature and bug fix rich updates to an already industry-standard-setting piece of software is refreshing in every way possible. Kudos to every single developer that works on WordPress.</p>
<h3>The Best Feed Reader: <a href="http://reader.google.com/">Google Reader</a></h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve wrote about Google Reader <a href="http://cdevroe.com/?s=google+reader">a few times</a>. I know that this is a touchy subject for some &#8211; because we all have very different ways of keeping up-to-date with our subscriptions &#8211; but I feel that Google deserves the recognition of building what has quickly become the most popular feed reader on any platform. <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/Individuals/NetNewsWire/">NetNewswire</a> held that title for a very long time, and deservedly so, but I believe the throne wasÂ usurpedÂ this year.</p>
<p>Side note: Boy do I miss <a href="http://ranchero.com/">Ranchero</a> in its original form.</p>
<h3>The Best Company: <a href="http://apple.com/">Apple, Inc.</a></h3>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but I have to give this award to Apple for their apparent take-over of the entire mobile, computing, and music industries. Regardless of relative size and market-share as of this moment, I believe that we&#8217;ve all seen what it looks like to rip these things out from other holders. In a few years Apple will be on top of every single list not just the &#8220;this year&#8217;s top&#8221; lists. I&#8217;m not sure how this will effect Apple overall but right now I&#8217;m happy that it is happening. Check back in 5 years to see if Apple makes my Worst Of 2013 list when I hate Apple for being like Microsoft, or something.</p>
<h3>The Best Mobile Twitter Client: <a href="http://hahlo.com/">Hahlo</a></h3>
<p>For me this is a no brainer. Being an iPhone-owner means that I have many, many applications at my disposal for posting and keeping up-to-date on <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a>. Whether we&#8217;re talking about iPhone applications or web applications built for the iPhone &#8211; Hahlo is far and away the best mobile Twitter client.</p>
<h3>The Best Twitter Account: <a href="http://twitter.com/marsphoenix/">@MarsPhoenix</a></h3>
<p>Duh. The Mars Phoenix Twitter account is the only somewhat-non-human account on Twitter that <a href="http://twitter.com/cdevroe/">I follow</a> that I&#8217;m not directly related with in some way. I&#8217;m sure there are other great Twitter accounts that are out of my own echo-chamber but this just strikes me as the obvious choice because of the way it has fundamentally changed the way that <a href="http://nasa.gov/">NASA</a> delivers its news about their programs.</p>
<h3>The Best iPhone application: <a href="http://gethandshake.com/">Handshake</a> &amp; <a href="http://ocarina.smule.com/">Ocarina</a></h3>
<p>Two bests? Yes. These two are tied for very different reasons. Handshake is probably <em>the</em> iPhone application that I feel should have been part of the iPhone all-along more than any other application that I have installed. Being able to <a href="http://cdevroe.com/links/iphone-app-handshake/">share contacts with other iPhone users</a> through the air is awesome. Ocarina just simply makes me happy in a way that no other iPhone application has done. I can&#8217;t play a lick of music with the thing. But the ability to listen to other people who are equally horrible Ocarina players makes this application get a dedicated spot on my iPhone&#8217;s home screen.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that for subjective!</p>
<h3>The Best Application: <a href="http://panic.com/coda/">Coda</a></h3>
<p>I don&#8217;t do near the same amount of programming as I once did. However, the one application that completely changed the way that I do programming has got to be Coda. It&#8217;s single-window environment has made working much more enjoyable, less frustrating, and much more focused than ever before. The latest update which allows other developers to extend its text-editing functionality will, I think, improve the built-in text editor at a much quicker pace. I&#8217;m really happy about that.</p>
<h3>The Best Browser: <a href="http://fluidapp.com/">Fluid</a></h3>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what else to call Fluid and it needs to be on my list somewhere. Â My normal browser of choice (that is, the browser that I use to &#8216;surf&#8217; the Web) is <a href="http://apple.com/safari/">Safari</a>. But as far as creating a single site browser for my favorite applications; Hahlo, Brighkite, Gmail, Google Docs, and Basecamp &#8211; Fluid is the best choice.</p>
<h3>The Best Preference Pane: <a href="http://www.nullriver.com/products/connect360">Connect 360</a></h3>
<p>This selection could also be categorized as <a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/connect360-appletv/">The Best Way To Save Money By Not Buying An AppleTV</a>. If you have an Xbox 360 and a Macintosh &#8211; I suggest purchasing a copy of Connect 360. You can use your Xbox 360 to view photos and videos and listen to music on the television in your living room. Painless. Perfect.</p>
<h3>The Best Email Client: <a href="http://gmail.com/">GMail</a></h3>
<p>I switched to GMail this year, using the aforementioned Fluid, and haven&#8217;t looked back. My main reason for switching was because Mail.app was slowing down a lot. On my first-generation black Macbook, using Mail.app with IMAP for 3 email accounts, Mail.app was incredibly sluggish. Â I&#8217;m fairly certain I could have done something to improve the performance of Mail.app &#8211; and I do appreciate its synergy with the Mac OS &#8211; but GMail has won me over with its speed and operator searches. To be specific, I use Gmail for domains and so does <a href="http://viddler.com/">Viddler</a>.</p>
<h3>The Best Messaging Client: <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/ichat.html">iChat</a></h3>
<p>I do not know why people on the Macintosh use anything else besides iChat. Not mentioning any names, most of the other clients do far too much or suck up too much memory or have features that just do not work. iChat works, is simple, has small foot print, and has generally every feature I could ever want in a messaging client.</p>
<h3>The Best Keyboard: <a href="http://apple.com/keyboard/">Apple&#8217;s wired keyboard</a>.</h3>
<p>How did a keyboard make this list of obviously Internet-related things? If you don&#8217;t ask, I don&#8217;t have to come up with an answer. My Macbook&#8217;s keyboard is crazy-fantastic. Since I connect to an external monitor while working in my office, I needed a keyboard that would offer the same level of crazy-fantasticness. Apple&#8217;s new wired keyboard does that. It has not only reduced the noise of typing &#8211; which I appreciate &#8211; but it has done it in a way that has not taken away from the tactile response that I have come to love.</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>In an effort to get this list out the door &#8211; this is not an exhaustive list. I didn&#8217;t keep a list throughout the year so this is an off-the-top-of-my-head list. Â I fully plan to add a few more &#8216;categories&#8217; to this list, especially if you care to suggest any in the comments, and will hopefully have a much more revised list for 2009. Â I will do one of these every year.</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone who made the list this year because, in some way, you made my technology experience much more enjoyable. You probably already have my money &#8211; but now you have my public applause too.</p>
<p>Suggestions, comments? Add them below!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/best-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Gruber: Celtics fan.</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/gruber-celtics-logo/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/gruber-celtics-logo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston celtic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is John Gruber a Celtics fan? He is right now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to back links to John Gruber&#8217;s <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a>? Â The way I figure it, I owe him a few thousand links to make up for his one link to my site.</p>
<div class="postImage-right"><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20080610-bnirthah8fip177ppehmd1xudy.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="61" /></div>
<p>Recently, and I&#8217;m not sure exactly when, John updated the logo graphic on his site. Something he doesn&#8217;t do all that often. This time John shows his loyalty to the Boston Celtics by saying &#8220;Beat L.A.&#8221;. Â Something he doesn&#8217;t do all that often either.</p>
<p>When the Celtics won the Eastern Conference Finals they, nearly immediately, began chanting &#8220;Beat L.A.! Beat L.A.!&#8221; and so now even the crowd gets into it at home games during the NBA Finals.</p>
<p>Doing a search of his site for Celtics only turns up a few mentions of the Boston-based team.</p>
<ol>
<li>In a quote about NBA Historical Footage &#8211; <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2005/december#sat-10-nba">December 10, 2005</a></li>
<li>When Red Auerbach, a man I met once, died. &#8211; <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2006/october#sun-29-auerbach">October 29, 2006</a></li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that John is a Celtics fan full time, or even a basketball fan in general, or if he just doesn&#8217;t like the Los Angeles Lakers enough to chant through his logo. Â Maybe he&#8217;ll write about it some day.<br />
Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/gruber-celtics-logo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Gruber: The platform is the story.</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/fireball-sdk-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/fireball-sdk-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Gruber's thoughts on the iPhone 3G and the iPhone SDK.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Gruber, sole author of <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a> my favorite weblog on the Internet, states what might seem as obvious to some &#8211; but I&#8217;m sure will be missed somewhat by the mass-media.</p>
<p>He sums up his thoughts of the lower-cost <a href="http://apple.com/iphone/">iPhone 3G</a>, and the iPhone SDK, this way:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The physical phone is not the story. A year from now, the iPhone 3G will be replaced by another new model. The platform is the story. Platforms have staying power, and, once entrenched, are very hard to displace.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, many of you might be thinking that this is obvious. Â But don&#8217;t be surprised if some of the &#8220;journalists&#8221; out there completely miss the point with today&#8217;s announcements. Â I can just hear the &#8220;Apple was afraid it wouldn&#8217;t sell enough iPhones so they lowered the price&#8221; headlines hitting the presses right now.</p>
<p>Source: Daring Fireball: <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/06/twice_as_fast">Twice as Fast, Half the Price</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/fireball-sdk-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odd tab dragging behavior in Safari 3.0</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/safari-tab-dragging/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/safari-tab-dragging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre igot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/links/safari-tab-dragging/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two equally anal articles regarding Safari's odd tab dragging behaviors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few of my geekiest and most nit-pickiest brain cells just exploded.  After reading about Safari&#8217;s odd tab dragging behavior, on two different Web sites on the same day, I am not sure I can take much more.</p>
<p>Both Pierre Igot and John Gruber cover this topic in great detail; the fact that the first user interaction with Safari&#8217;s tabs while dragging ultimately determine their ability to either reorder the tab and/or open a new window/tab.  But that&#8217;s generalizing it far too much.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re an anal Safari nut, like me, I suggest you read both of their articles. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.betalogue.com/2008/01/31/safari-30-dragging-tabs-up-or-down-to-move-them-sideways/">Safari 3.0: Dragging tabs up or down to move them sideways</a>.<br />
Secondary, source: <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/04/safari_tab_dragging_modes">Safari&#8217;s Tab Dragging Modes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/safari-tab-dragging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Gruber compares the Firefox 3 and Safari 3 browsers</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/firefox3-vs-safari3-fireball/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/firefox3-vs-safari3-fireball/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/links/firefox3-vs-safari3-fireball/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excellent comparison of two Internet browsers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t read <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a> already, you may consider this link also a recommendation to do so.  In fact, I recommend <a href="http://daringfireball.net/members/">becoming a member</a>, and after you read John Gruber&#8217;s comparison of the Firefox 3 and Safari 3 browsers, you&#8217;ll know why.</p>
<p>John does an excellent job reviewing these two applications based on a number of factors including interface, design, feature-sets, and how well each fits into the Operating System.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I love Firefoxâ€™s auto-restoration of tabs and windows. Quit Firefox, relaunch it, and your previously-open tabs and windows are restored. Safari 3 has this feature, but makes you do it manually via the â€œReopen All Windows From Last Sessionâ€ command in the History menu. Iâ€™m sure most Safari users have no idea this feature even exists. At least as a preference, Safari should offer the ability to do this automatically.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>He&#8217;s right.  I never knew that feature was even there.  It is little tidbits like this, and John&#8217;s superb writing, that have made me never regret my membership fee to Daring Fireball.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/04/firefox_3_safari_3">Daring Fireball: Firefox 3 vs. Safari 3</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/firefox3-vs-safari3-fireball/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/iphone-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/iphone-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason-kottke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metoday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photobooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viddler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wish-list]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/iphone-thoughts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My thoughts on the iPhone and what I'd like to see in the first software update from Apple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I begin gushing about the <a href="http://apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> I have to mention, especially for those of you that do not have one yet, that you can win one of two free 8Gb iPhones that <a href="http://blog.viddler.com/cdevroe/iphone-contest/">we&#8217;re giving away over at Viddler</a> just for doing simple MeToday videos.  Each video you do (one per day per person) is an entry into the contest.  No, you don&#8217;t <em>have</em> to do one every single day.  But since each video is an entry one would think that the more MeTodays that you do, the better chance you have at winning!  We&#8217;ll give someone an iPhone on the 15th and 30th of July.  So don&#8217;t read the rest of this post!  Go get a <a href="http://www.viddler.com/">Viddler</a> account!</p>
<div class="postImage-left"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cdevroe/665614151/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1131/665614151_8b0a70f15a_m.jpg" width="180" height="240" alt="MeToday: June 29, 2007" /></a>
<p>My precious!</p>
</div>
<p>Ok.  So what do I think of the iPhone?  As you might have already guessed, I love it.  For the entire weekend I rarely got onto my Macbook to do anything except sync my latest settings of my iPhone to the computer.  The iPhone is a great mini-computer for getting most of your core Internet activities done like checking/responding to email, surfing the web for information, or other simple daily tasks like this.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t get into the speed of the EDGE network or how the virtual keyboard is.  To me these are non-issues thus far and I don&#8217;t have much to compare these two things to since I have never had a cell phone that used the Internet, nor a full sized hard keyboard.  I can type pretty fast on the keyboard and the Internet is nearly as fast as being home on Wifi.  So again, both are non-issues.</p>
<h3>Again, it is the little things</h3>
<p>One of my fellow line-waiters <a href="http://daringfireball.net/" rel="friend met">John Gruber</a> did a fantastic job giving <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2007/06/iphone_first_impressions">his general overview of each feature of the iPhone</a> the other day.  My impressions are on par with John&#8217;s except that I&#8217;ve found myself typing just fine.  Be sure to read his thoughts if you&#8217;d like to catch some of the nice things about each &#8220;feature&#8221; of the iPhone.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;d like to extend his list a little bit to remark on some of the little things I&#8217;ve noticed while using the iPhone that I think make the experience all the more enjoyable.</p>
<p>The <strong>weight of the iPhone</strong> came as a surprise to some.  Yes, it feels heavier than it looks.  To me this make the iPhone feel tough and rugged when compared to the way it looks.  I think the fact that we&#8217;re seeing people surprised at how tough the iPhone actually is, is because it doesn&#8217;t <em>look</em> very rugged.  It looks elegant, which doesn&#8217;t usually mean tough.  However the weight of the iPhone makes it feel very rugged to me.</p>
<p>The <strong>speed of the interface</strong> is something that I was very skeptical about.  The commercials led me to believe that the interface was just as fast, if not faster, than switching windows on my computer.  In my relatively little experience with mobile phones &#8211; the interfaces on these things have never been described by me as &#8220;snappy&#8221; or &#8220;fast&#8221;.  However the iPhone&#8217;s interface, in general, is incredibly fast.  When speaking with John Gruber in line, he remarked how the iPhone&#8217;s &#8220;one app at a time&#8221; focus really lent itself to being able to be very fast.  The iPhone doesn&#8217;t need to show windows inside of windows or multiple layers or even windows on top of windows.  The application that you are currently looking at is obviously getting the priority in the Operating System which makes the iPhone blaze.</p>
<p>The <strong>sleep, volume, silent, and home buttons</strong> are the perfect combination of buttons that were decided to be &#8220;hard buttons&#8221;.  Although one can easily adjust the volume in most applications within the iPhone&#8217;s interface, you can also use the hard volume control on the side of the iPhone.  The same goes for the silent and sleep buttons &#8211; I never have to &#8220;turn on&#8221; the iPhone to use these options.  And the home button is definitely far better than keeping the &#8220;doc&#8221; visible and having a &#8220;desktop&#8221; button or something.  I&#8217;m really glad the iPhone has a home button.</p>
<p>Within each application on the iPhone there are small, hidden gems that you will only find through experimentation or someone telling you that they are there.  Like the ability to turn on the caps lock key, or tapping the top bar to auto-scroll to the top of the page in Safari (both tips came from John Gruber&#8217;s site), etc.  None of these small interface features are handed over, but once you find them you love them.</p>
<h3>Of course, I want more</h3>
<p>Keeping in mine that, technically, this is iPhone 1.0 which includes all the hardware and software that came in those beautiful black bags on Friday, I have a few things that I&#8217;d like to see improved.  I&#8217;m sure that, internally, this is build 10,000+ of the iPhone&#8217;s OS and its applications, but from my perspective it is still 1.0.  Being such, I fully expected to have the wish list that follows.</p>
<ul>
<li>Better integration with Gmail.  Right now Gmail marks things as &#8220;being downloaded&#8221; when I look at them either via Mail.app on my Macbook or on my iPhone.  This causes some frustration since I&#8217;d like all of my email to be &#8220;everywhere&#8221;.  To fix this, I think either Google or Apple will have to update it so that it marks it as being read on the iPhone or not.  Either way, the email &#8220;works&#8221; &#8211; but it could work a little bit better.  (Side note:  On the first day of release, the Gmail integration was wrought with problems ranging from getting duplicate messages to simply not working with Google App&#8217;s hosted domain email.  These issues have been fixed, presumably by Google, over the weekend.  So ++ to them.)</li>
<li>Though I haven&#8217;t used the &#8220;Notes&#8221; feature yet, I could see a huge amount of improvement being done here, which might make me want to use Notes on the iPhone.  Simply saving the notes saved as RTF files that are synced to your computer into ~/Documents/iPhone Notes/ would suffice for me.  Why create notes that you can&#8217;t really use?  A work around is taking a notes contents and creating an email out of it, which can be done fairly easily.</li>
<li>iCal integration seems to work &#8220;ok&#8221; but I have the same complaints as others.  If I have separate calendars within iCal they should also be separate within iPhone&#8217;s calendar application.  And, when syncing with my Macbook, I shouldn&#8217;t have to choose only one calendar that the iPhone can write to.  I am not sure why there is this limitation.  Something else I noticed is that if I setup an iCal alert on the iPhone it works perfectly but it doesn&#8217;t work within iCal.  It shows up in the application but iCal never shows me the the alert when I asked it to.  Not sure why, perhaps this is a bug.</li>
<li>The camera feature should allow a photo to be taken by tapping <em>anywhere</em> on the screen.  I think some people would hate this because it would cause a lot of accidental photos to be taken, but taking photos of yourself and someone else with the iPhone is very hard with only a small button to push.  Perhaps this could be a setting?  Can has Photobooth for the camera?  I don&#8217;t care about the crazy bulging eyes and stretching chins stuff, but it&#8217;d be nice to have the ability to take black and white photos or something simple.  Obviously this is a minor, minor update that I&#8217;d enjoy seeing to the Camera feature.</li>
<li>Small browser cache?  From what I&#8217;ve been able to tell Safari on the iPhone only caches the current page you are looking at.  Reloading a page is fairly quick but the second you navigate away from a URL the cached version is lost.  I have an 8Gb iPhone, I wouldn&#8217;t mind dedicating even a few hundred megabytes to Safari&#8217;s caching if it would mean that hitting the back button wouldn&#8217;t reload the page.</li>
<li>Normal headphone jacks &#8220;don&#8217;t work&#8221; with the iPhone because the iPhone&#8217;s input jack is sunken so low into the casing of the iPhone.  <a href="http://kottke.org/">Jason Kottke</a> resolved this by actually cutting his headphones a little bit to allow the jack to sink in deeper.  There are several add-ons being offered to make this easier, but I am unsure why this was done in the first place?</li>
<li>The iPod allows you to update your set of icons on the button of its menu.  I think this should be an option in all applications on the iPhone including the home screen.  There are a few web applications that are being released for the iPhone that I&#8217;d love to create a shortcut to from my home screen.  The first button I&#8217;d get rid of from the home screen?  YouTube followed by Stocks.  I simply won&#8217;t use those things on my iPhone too often.</li>
<li>Google Maps on the iPhone is amazing!  But I feel this application will probably receive the greatest number of updates over time.  It is perhaps one of the most &#8220;complex&#8221; applications on the iPhone and using it is a delight most of the time.  However, there are a few usability problems when you switch from searching for a location to getting directions to that same location.  (I&#8217;ve found that it is easier to save locations in your Google Maps bookmarks.)  I&#8217;m sure these little things will be improved soon and that integration with the rest of the phone&#8217;s applications will happen in the future.  One of the first things that comes to mind is to tell the camera application where you are using the Maps feature, which would in turn write the Latitude and Longitude to the photos.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m going to cut this list short because, as I said, this is a 1.0 release and one that I&#8217;m overwhelmingly happy with.  I&#8217;ve found the iPhone becoming an extension of my laptop in ways I hadn&#8217;t considered before.  I knew that I&#8217;d find the iPhone useful, I didn&#8217;t expect to want to use it more than my laptop.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts on the iPhone?  Any wishes that I didn&#8217;t cover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/iphone-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword Manager for iPhoto</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/keyword-mananger/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/keyword-mananger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword-manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maczot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/keyword-mananger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you use iPhoto.  You should buy the Keyword Manager for iPhoto.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was half expecting to write a very long, detailed review of <a href="http://www.bullstorm.se/KeywordManager.php">the Keyword Manager for iPhoto</a>.  However, I will not.  I will just say that if you are the type of person that is willing to invest in their personal data&#8217;s future &#8211; and the ability to find it quickly and easily, the Keyword Manager for iPhoto is your key.</p>
<p>Personally, I recommend paying full price for the Keyword Manager.  It is completely worth it, and the support is top notch.  There are ways to save money (via MacZot today only, and using Coupon Codes that you can find just about everywhere), but I <em>suggest strongly</em> that you purchase a copy at full price.</p>
<p>John Gruber <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2006/11/pinprick" rel="friend">said it best</a> &#8220;Aim for high quality and set your price accordingly.&#8221;.  The developers of Keyword Manager have done just that, and while they are trying to get their name out there with these promotions &#8211; I still believe that this is one plugin that is worth more than it&#8217;s price tag.</p>
<p>[tags]iphoto, apple, macintosh, keywords, tagging, bullstorm, keyword manager, john gruber, daringfireball, maczot[/tags]<br />
[slug]keyword-mananger[/slug]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/keyword-mananger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good journalism</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/good-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/good-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 21:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daringfireball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-gruber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/good-journalism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Gruber needs some kind of award.  Please, someone create an award to give him, if need be.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could write like <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">John Gruber</a>, <a href="http://theubergeeks.net/2006/05/01/macintoshes-and-their-apparent-viruses/">my article</a> on the subject would have been written like <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2006/05/good_journalism">his article on the subject</a>.  I guess that is why <a href="http://daringfireball.net/members/">I send him my money every year</a>.  Well earned John, well frickin&#8217; earned.</p>
<p>[tags]journalism, john gruber, daringfireball, macintosh, viruses, virus, windows, microsoft, apple[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/good-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

