<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cdevroe.com &#187; chromium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/tag/chromium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com</link>
	<description>by Colin Devroe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cdevroe.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='cdevroe.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Switching to Google Chrome Developer channel</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/chrome-dev-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/chrome-dev-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For months I&#8217;ve been using Chromium the open source browser that powers Google Chrome. Using Chromium had its advantages and disadvantages. I had the bleeding edge of what was offered by the Chromium team &#8211; whether it was stable or not. But, I also had to manually update my personal copy of Chromium on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For months I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://www.chromium.org/">Chromium</a> the open source browser that powers <a href="http://google.com/chrome/">Google Chrome</a>. Using Chromium had its advantages and disadvantages. I had the bleeding edge of what was offered by the Chromium team &#8211; whether it was stable or not. But, I also had to manually update my personal copy of Chromium on a nearly daily basis.</p>
<p>Not anymore. I&#8217;ve been wanting to switch to the Google Chrome Developer channel (or, the still pretty darned bleed edge releases) for a few weeks but hadn&#8217;t had the time to figure out how. After I saw my friend in bleeding edge Chromium releases <a href="http://justinblanton.com/">Justin Blanton</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/jblanton/status/8552371636">take the plunge</a> I began hunting. Turns out, it is pretty easy once you found the right link.</p>
<p>I found this link <a href="http://blog.chromium.org/2010/01/before-you-change-that-channel.html">via the Chromium Blog</a> &#8211; but there is an <a href="http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">Early Access Release Channels page</a> that explains what each release channel is, its purpose, and how you can get involved. The nice thing about these channels is that these are releases of Google Chrome, not just Chromium, and as such are slightly more stable and refined then the Chromium nightlies I&#8217;ve been using. Updating to the next release is also easier in that it happens within the application itself and it continues on the same channel you choose be it beta or developer.</p>
<div id="attachment_3674" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px"><a href="http://cdevroe.com/wp-content/mobile/photos/2010/02/chrome-bookmark-compare.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-3674  " title="Chromium vs. Chrome Bookmark Manager" src="http://cdevroe.com/wp-content/mobile/photos/2010/02/chrome-bookmark-compare.jpg" alt="" width="290" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Left: Chromium Right: Google Chrome Dev channel</p></div>
<p>For example, remember how <a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/chromium-bookmark-manager/">I complained about Chromium&#8217;s Bookmark Manager</a>? Remember those hideous buttons? Well, they are much nicer in Google Chrome then they are in Chromium. Take a look at the graphic that shows the difference between the two. Though the action button doesn&#8217;t do much (yet) it does fit much nicer into the Mac ecosystem. Obviously the source list on the left is much nicer as well.</p>
<p>Switching from Chromium to Google Chrome was made all the more easy due to Google&#8217;s free Bookmark Syncing service. If you&#8217;d like to help test the very latest build of Chrome follow the links on that Early Access Release Channels to download your flavor of Chrome based on which channel you&#8217;d like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/chrome-dev-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RSS Subscription extension for Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/rss-sub-ext-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/rss-sub-ext-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss subscription extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a great example of a good extension written for Google Chrome. The RSS Subscription extension is built by someone on the Chromium team and it brings in the unified feed icon button into the location bar to subscribe to any feeds found on a site. Works perfectly, fits naturally, has a fair amount [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a great example of a good extension written for <a href="http://google.com/chrome/">Google Chrome</a>. <a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/nlbjncdgjeocebhnmkbbbdekmmmcbfjd">The RSS Subscription extension</a> is built by someone on the <a href="http://code.google.com/chromium/">Chromium</a> team and it brings in <a href="http://www.feedicons.com/">the unified feed icon</a> button into the location bar to subscribe to any feeds found on a site. Works perfectly, fits naturally, has a fair amount of options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/rss-sub-ext-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Chromium Bookmark Manager</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/chromium-bookmark-manager/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/chromium-bookmark-manager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookmark manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome for mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago I updated to the latest nightly build of Chromium, something I do every few days using TechCrunch&#8217;s Chrome-Up application, and was elated to discover that Chromium finally has a Bookmark Manager. Up until this release I was unable to edit any of the bookmarks that I had imported from Safari into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A few days ago <a href="http://twitter.com/cdevroe/statuses/7850834211">I updated to the latest nightly build of Chromium</a>, something I do every few days using <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/16/our-mac-chromium-updater-stay-up-to-date-on-the-best-versions-of-chrome-for-mac/">TechCrunch&#8217;s Chrome-Up application</a>, and was elated to discover that Chromium finally has a Bookmark Manager. Up until this release I was unable to edit any of the bookmarks that I had imported from Safari into Chromium. It was frustrating.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdevroe.com/wp-content/mobile/photos/2010/01/Chromium-Bookmark-Manager.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3572" title="Chromium Bookmark Manager" src="http://cdevroe.com/wp-content/mobile/photos/2010/01/Chromium-Bookmark-Manager.jpg" alt="" width="480" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve now finally been able to update, sort and delete my bookmarks (which are automatically synced with my Google Account). Something I wasn&#8217;t able to do for months and has taken my already fairly bubbly adoration of Chromium and taken it to the next level. A clean browser is a happy browser.</p>
<p>I was surprised, though, at the overall design and implementation of the Bookmark Manager in Chromium. It feels very rushed. Even though I use a nightly build, which is as cutting-edge as you can possibly get, I expected to see a very different approach than what is pictured above.</p>
<p>Chromium&#8217;s New Tab, History, Downloads and Extensions pages are very different from what we see in most other browsers. The New Tab page, as an example, is much more like Safari&#8217;s Top Sites page (although not nearly as cool). The Downloads page I find particularly useful. It shows up like a Web page and shows you everything that you downloaded recently, by day, with a link back to the page it originated from, a link to the file itself on your own system, etc. Functionally it is very much the same as Safari and Firefox&#8217;s Downloads pop-up window but Chrome&#8217;s is altogether nicer, in my opinion, because it shows up in a tab.</p>
<p>I expected Chromium to have the same sort of &#8220;Web page&#8221; feeling to its Bookmark Manager. Maybe this is a case of &#8216;don&#8217;t fix it if it ain&#8217;t broken&#8217; but I think there is huge potential for browsers to reinvent the way bookmarks are managed. Why not plug into some social bookmarking sites? (I know there are Firefox plugins that do stuff like this) Why not give us an unlimited amount of metadata to attribute to a bookmark? I remember when Firefox implemented shortcodes for bookmarks, like &#8216;gr&#8217; for Google Reader as an example, and you could just type &#8216;gr&#8217; + Enter and off you went to that bookmark. I would <em>love</em> to see that in Chromium (and Safari).</p>
<p>And what about the plus, minus, and eye buttons on the toolbar? I have never, ever, ever seen anything like those on any operating system.Â Perhaps I&#8217;m looking too far into what are basically alpha level builds. Maybe what will end up being released with Chrome for Mac will be vastly different than what is appearing currently in Chromium (I hope so).</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m extremely happy to finally be able to edit my bookmarks in Chromium and I always look forward to the next nightly update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/chromium-bookmark-manager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Chrome all the time</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/all-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/all-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using Chrome as my default browser for nearly six months. It won Best Browser in my Best of 2009 list. I didn&#8217;t even realize it had been that long until I went back through some of the things I wrote about Chrome here in First initial, last name. To be more specific, actually, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://google.com/chrome/">Chrome</a> as my default browser for nearly six months. It won Best Browser in <a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/best-of-2009/">my Best of 2009 list</a>. I didn&#8217;t even realize it had been that long until I went back through some of <a href="http://cdevroe.com/?s=chromium+chrome">the things I wrote about Chrome here in First initial, last name</a>. To be more specific, actually, I&#8217;ve been using a Chromium nightly build &#8211; which is the open source project behind the official Google Chrome releases.</p>
<p>To keep my build of Chromium up-to-date I use <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/16/our-mac-chromium-updater-stay-up-to-date-on-the-best-versions-of-chrome-for-mac/">Techcrunch&#8217;s Chrome-Up application</a> built by MG Siegler and Greg Rosen.</p>
<p>Now that an official release of Chrome for Mac is out there it is being evaluated by some of the Macintosh community. John Gruber <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/01/12/chrome-friesel">recently linked to</a> someone who had tried Chrome for a week before it actually stuck. I can see why &#8211; switching browsers from Safari to Chrome won&#8217;t win you any new features. In fact, it may even force you to give up a few. But what makes Chrome better than any other browser on the Macintosh, at least for me, is pure foot-to-the-floor speed.</p>
<p>There are a few neat features, for sure. The &#8220;New Tab&#8221; page, arguably not as nice as Safari&#8217;s Top Sites feature, makes it pretty simple to set up a good way to get to what you want. Bookmark sync is nice. <a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions?hl=en-US">Extensions</a>, I think, will play a huge roll in the success of Chrome &#8211; especially when it is pitted against Safari. Google has taken the right path with Extensions and <a href="http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/">how you build them</a>, too.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s about it. Here&#8217;s the one-liner for Chrome; it is really fast. Everything else is gravy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/all-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dipped in Chrome</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/dipped-in-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/dipped-in-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluidapp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's approach here is interesting.  This is the first real step towards making the Web the application, and the browser just the "thing" that loads it into view.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="Viddler.com in Google Chrome" src="http://img.skitch.com/20080904-gfpsyg3fm28x8tmetpesm2fn8q.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="442" /></p>
<p><a href="http://google.com/chrome/">Google&#8217;s Chrome</a>, the new Web browser by Google, has been getting a lot of attention because of its simple approach to browsing the Web. Â But there is more here than meets the eye. It is all about the approach.</p>
<p>The new application has its flaws, for sure, but what it gets wrong it makes up for in what it gets right. Â Google has long been an advocate of speed. Â &#8221;Speed is a feature.&#8221; Â Many other browser manufacturers, namely Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla, have continuously strived to push the needle on speed, faster page loading time, and overall memory usage of their software products. They&#8217;ve done this while also trying to jam more features into the browser. Â What they&#8217;ve ultimately failed to do though, is what Google succeeded at; removing the application from the application.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s approach here is interesting. Â This is the first real step towards making the Web the application, and the browser just the &#8220;thing&#8221; that loads it into view. Â Over on <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a> John Gruber <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2008/09/02/chromium">quoted this bit</a>, which I find really interesting:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the long term, we think of Chromium as a tabbed window manager or shell for the web rather than a browser application. We avoid putting things into our UI in the same way you would hope that Apple and Microsoft would avoid putting things into the standard window frames of applications on their operating systems.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You know how the iPhone or iPod touch loads web applications with nearly no UI unless you scroll up? Â That is sort of the approach that Google Chrome is taking. Â Just render the page in an insanely fast and stable way &#8211; that is the goal.</p>
<p>Is Google Chrome a &#8220;Single Site Browser&#8221; the way the next version of Safari is going to be or the way that <a href="http://fluidapp.com/">Fluid</a> already is? Â Sort of. Â In the &#8220;Page control&#8221; menu (not sure I like that name either) there is an option to &#8220;Create application short cuts&#8221;. Â You can install these shortcuts on your Desktop, Start Menu, and Quick Launch bar. Â Personally I think it would have been neat if they automatically asked to setup Gmail, Google Reader, Calendar, etc. when I installed &#8211; but everyone knows that they would have caught some serious heat for that if they did. Â For those of us liking the SSB experience, Google Chrome works.</p>
<p>It is tough to say what Google Chrome &#8220;gets wrong&#8221;. Â I&#8217;ve seen reports of various rendering problems, but I don&#8217;t think that is something Chrome <em>got wrong</em>. Â That is fairly easily fixed in the next version so long as they iron out their use of Webkit.</p>
<p>To sum up; the approach Google is taking here is refreshing. Â Clean, simple, and fast. A feature for feature comparison of Google Chrome against any browser would not be a fair way to gauge its affect on the marketplace. Â Time will tell.</p>
<p>Now, when they release a Macintosh version, then I&#8217;ll really kick the tires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/dipped-in-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

