<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cdevroe.com &#187; bit.ly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/tag/bitly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com</link>
	<description>by Colin Devroe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cdevroe.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='cdevroe.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s URL shortening technique makes copy/paste difficult</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/twitter-url-copypaste/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/twitter-url-copypaste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url shortening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter, by default, uses Bit.ly to shorten URLs for use with SMS, the API, etc. But on its Web site Twitter shows you the original URL (or at least part of it) so that people know where they&#8217;ll be going if they click on the link. Or, at least that is why I think they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter, by default, uses Bit.ly to shorten URLs for use with SMS, the API, etc. But on its Web site Twitter shows you the original URL (or at least part of it) so that people know where they&#8217;ll be going if they click on the link. Or, at least that is why I think they are doing it. If they were to keep the Bit.ly URL then people wouldn&#8217;t know what will happen if they click on the link.</p>
<p>However, this causes some problems when trying to copy/paste a tweet. See the screenshot of <a href="http://twitter.com/cdevroe/status/5997875149">this tweet</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/cdevroe/status/5997875149"><img src="http://cdevroe.com/wp-content/mobile/photos/2009/11/Twitter-_-Colin-Devroe_-The-last-item-we-need-to-s-....jpg" alt="Twitter, short url" title="Twitter, short url" width="460" /></a></p>
<p>If you try to copy/paste that Tweet you&#8217;ll end up getting an unusable URL. Perhaps Twitter should throw the 140 character limit out of the window on the tweet permalinks to make the full URL visible. This would make it easier to copy/paste but also simple to see whether or not the URL you are clicking on will lead to a Web page, a PDF file, an MP3 file, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/twitter-url-copypaste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you don&#8217;t need a URL shortening service if you use WordPress</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/wp-short-urls/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/wp-short-urls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url shortener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress-plugin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=2682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was in the mood for a long post title. Sue me. My thoughts on URL shortening services are pretty public but that doesn&#8217;t mean that I don&#8217;t have a need for them. I prefer Bit.ly over any other URL shortening services that I&#8217;ve used to-date. With Tr.im dying I thought that there was always [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in the mood for a long post title. Sue me.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/url-shorteners-suck/">My thoughts on URL shortening services</a> are pretty public but that doesn&#8217;t mean that I don&#8217;t have a need for them. I prefer <a href="http://bit.ly/">Bit.ly</a> over any other URL shortening services that I&#8217;ve used to-date.</p>
<p>With <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/08/09/trim-shuts-down/">Tr.im dying</a> I thought that there was always the possibility of Bit.ly going down the same path. It was time to create my own URL shortening service for short URLs pointing to my site using my own domain. I browsed around, found two WordPress plugins that could have been candidates &#8211; but ultimately decided to use nothing but vanilla WordPress.</p>
<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/short-url-plugin/">The Short URL plugin</a> makes it very easy to take any URL and make it nice a short, track clicks, etc. I have this installed in case I want to shorten URLs that are not ultimately here on my site. (Though I still plan on using Bit.ly for these links). <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/short-post-urls/">Short Post URLs</a> is a plugin that seemingly does exactly what I want &#8211; which is make a shorter URL automatically for every post here on my site. However, the problem is that by default the plugin does not redirect from the short URL to the long one. This means that my posts would have two URLs. This isn&#8217;t what I was looking for and I didn&#8217;t want to hack someone else&#8217;s plugin.</p>
<p>That is when I saw it, right under my nose. The default link for any post on any WordPress blog is domain.com?p=postID. For instance, the short URL for this post is http://cdevroe.com/?p=2682. If you <a href="http://cdevroe.com/?p=2682">link to that URL</a> WordPress will automatically forward that request to the full URL. Simple. Beautiful. Exactly what I need.</p>
<p>Occam&#8217;s Razor in full effect.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> <a href="http://deanjrobinson.com/">Dean Robinson</a>, maker of the fine mobile Twitter client <a href="http://hahlo.com/">Hahlo</a>, <a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/wp-short-urls/#comment-332557">suggests in the comments</a> adding a simple line to your .htaccess file (if you&#8217;re so inclined) to pretty up your URLs. I&#8217;ve decided to add this for mine so that now both the original, default WordPress URL of ?p=postID works as well as /p/postID works now. Thanks Dean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/wp-short-urls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter replaces TinyURL with Bit.ly, will they buy it?</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/twitter-bitly-king/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/links/twitter-bitly-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall kirkpatric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readwriteweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url shortener]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=2178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Marshall Kirkpatrick of ReadWriteWeb Twitter has &#8220;crowned Bit.ly the King of all Short Links&#8221; and replaced TinyURL as the default URL shortening service that Twitter uses. (I&#8217;m cdevroe, btw) Scaling Bit.ly to keep up with the demands of Twitter, since Twitter is growing at a remarkable rate, is an obvious concern. Will Twitter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Marshall Kirkpatrick of ReadWriteWeb <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twitter_crowns_bitly_as_the_king_of_short_links_he.php">Twitter has &#8220;crowned Bit.ly the King of all Short Links&#8221;</a> and replaced TinyURL as the default URL shortening service that Twitter uses. (I&#8217;m <a href="http://twitter.com/cdevroe/">cdevroe</a>, btw)</p>
<p>Scaling <a href="http://bit.ly/">Bit.ly</a> to keep up with the demands of Twitter, since Twitter is growing at a remarkable rate, is an obvious concern. Will Twitter buy Bit.ly to help scale/fund it? I hope they do. Not only because I like Bit.ly &#8211; but because then I could say <a href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/url-shorteners-suck/">I told you so</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/links/twitter-bitly-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter should buy Bit.ly (or, Yes! URL shorteners DO suck)</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/url-shorteners-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://cdevroe.com/notes/url-shorteners-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason-kottke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joshua schachter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tinyurl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url shortening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Internet is (was on April 3rd) ablaze with the talk of how bad URL shorteners are ever since Joshua Schachter, the guy that built and sold del.icio.us, jotted down his thoughts on them. These facts are nothing new and, I&#8217;ll bet, do not allude those that built these services. But, they see a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Internet is (was on April 3rd) ablaze with the talk of how bad URL shorteners are ever since Joshua Schachter, the guy that built and sold <a href="http://del.icio.us/">del.icio.us</a>, <a href="http://joshua.schachter.org/2009/04/on-url-shorteners.html">jotted down his thoughts on them</a>.</p>
<p>These facts are nothing new and, I&#8217;ll bet, do not allude those that built these services. But, they see a general use and purpose for these services and decided to provide their own solution to the problem.</p>
<p>The problem is that, in some cases, you need a shorter URL than the one provided by a particular Web site. Web sites with incredibly long URLs (like Amazon, Google Maps, or search results on a site) can be cumbersome to deal with in situations like writing email, Twittering (<a href="http://twitter.com/cdevroe/">I&#8217;m cdevroe</a> by the way), and sending SMS messages. URL shorteners attempt to solve this problem by creating links to these pages much easier by providing a significantly shorter URL that simply redirects to the URL that you chose.</p>
<p>Seems innocent enough. Seems simple enough. However, by creating a shorter URL that represents a longer one you&#8217;re, as Joshua states, adding unneeded layers that could potentially fail overtime. If the URL shortening service manages 1,000,000 redirects, and suddenly goes down, those redirects no longer work. This is a big problem.</p>
<p>For services like Twitter, which benefit greatly from these URL shortening services due to their short message limit, they stand to have millions and millions of dead links. Right now, by default, Twitter uses <a href="http://tinyurl.com/">TinyURL</a> to automatically shorten URLs to help them fit into the 140 character limit for SMS messages. Jason Kottke <a href="http://www.kottke.org/09/04/url-shorteners-suck">suggested</a> that Twitter create its own URL shortening service so that they can guarantee it be around forever and to replace all of the short URLs it had created in the past. I&#8217;m going to go one step further and suggest that they buy <a href="http://bit.ly/">Bit.ly</a>. </p>
<p>While Twitter has chosen to use TinyURL I believe this was because Bit.ly wasn&#8217;t around when they added the TinyURL functionality. Bit.ly is more on par with Twitter&#8217;s real-time efforts. Twitter would immediately get their own URL shortening service that has, on top of it, a very good statistics package to show how those links are being used, where they are clicked on from, how many people clicked them, and a service that has a good API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cdevroe.com/notes/url-shorteners-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

