<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another shot at the&#160;moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/photos/another-shot-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com/photos/another-shot-moon/</link>
	<description>Personal thoughts and notes.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin Devroe</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/photos/another-shot-moon/#comment-169560</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=723#comment-169560</guid>
		<description>Kyle: Not yet, actually, though I do plan on it.  One of those things on the ever-long-list of to-dos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle: Not yet, actually, though I do plan on it.  One of those things on the ever-long-list of to-dos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/photos/another-shot-moon/#comment-169374</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=723#comment-169374</guid>
		<description>I've had a lot of trouble shooting the moon as well.  I think it has something to do with the difference in brightness between the dark background sky and the bright moon.  Have you ever tried any sorts of adapters for your telescope?  I bet you could produce some decent shots that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a lot of trouble shooting the moon as well.  I think it has something to do with the difference in brightness between the dark background sky and the bright moon.  Have you ever tried any sorts of adapters for your telescope?  I bet you could produce some decent shots that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
