<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tagging with keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/</link>
	<description>by Colin Devroe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Docs takes two steps, backward? &#124; Colin Devroe</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-41712</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Docs takes two steps, backward? &#124; Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-41712</guid>
		<description>[...] interface is much better than the old one - except that Google has seemingly taken tags, or labels (see this post for more about labels), and turned them into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interface is much better than the old one &#8211; except that Google has seemingly taken tags, or labels (see this post for more about labels), and turned them into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-17231</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-17231</guid>
		<description>Ah there I agree 100%.  Labels (google tags) do not go with blogs or blogger.  

and you are right - I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a big issue here :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah there I agree 100%.  Labels (google tags) do not go with blogs or blogger.  </p>
<p>and you are right &#8211; I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a big issue here <img src='http://cdevroe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin D. Devroe</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-17183</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin D. Devroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-17183</guid>
		<description>Daniel:  Although I use Gmail I rarely use the Web interface.  I can see why they&#039;d used labels for email I suppose, but not on Blogger.  For some reason labels do indeed fit, in my opinion, with email, but not with blogger.

Like I said though, I don&#039;t think it matters too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel:  Although I use Gmail I rarely use the Web interface.  I can see why they&#8217;d used labels for email I suppose, but not on Blogger.  For some reason labels do indeed fit, in my opinion, with email, but not with blogger.</p>
<p>Like I said though, I don&#8217;t think it matters too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-17168</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/tag-keyword-label/#comment-17168</guid>
		<description>I really think this was something google did because they needed something to spite the whole &quot;folder&quot; idea.

Ie. Marketed like this:

Old way of doing email. 

Label goes on a folder.  Email goes in a folder. 

New way of doing email: skip the folder.

Label goes on an email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think this was something google did because they needed something to spite the whole &#8220;folder&#8221; idea.</p>
<p>Ie. Marketed like this:</p>
<p>Old way of doing email. </p>
<p>Label goes on a folder.  Email goes in a folder. </p>
<p>New way of doing email: skip the folder.</p>
<p>Label goes on an email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

