<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Flickr video means to the rest of&#160;us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/</link>
	<description>Personal thoughts and notes.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sjoerd Koopman</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-149095</link>
		<dc:creator>Sjoerd Koopman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-149095</guid>
		<description>I think it is a fantastic development and well presented in Colin's post. It is the same reason for having more than one anchor store in a shopping mall. If there was only a one department store like Bloomie's you might never go to the mall. But because and  Sak's and Barney's are anchored there as well, you might end up going to that mall. (substitute Penny's, Mervyn's and Target if those are your preferred stores).

More importantly because of the presence of the other anchors, one day you just might decide to drop into a Bloomie's- because you are there already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a fantastic development and well presented in Colin&#8217;s post. It is the same reason for having more than one anchor store in a shopping mall. If there was only a one department store like Bloomie&#8217;s you might never go to the mall. But because and  Sak&#8217;s and Barney&#8217;s are anchored there as well, you might end up going to that mall. (substitute Penny&#8217;s, Mervyn&#8217;s and Target if those are your preferred stores).</p>
<p>More importantly because of the presence of the other anchors, one day you just might decide to drop into a Bloomie&#8217;s- because you are there already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi, I&#8217;m Colin. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pennsylvania might as well be in Israel</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-149070</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi, I&#8217;m Colin. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pennsylvania might as well be in Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-149070</guid>
		<description>[...] I was the Technology Evangelist for a video-sharing site based out of Silicon Valley - do you think my post about what Flickr video means to the rest of the industry would have gone relatively unnoticed by the online press?  I doubt it.  Do I think my post should [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was the Technology Evangelist for a video-sharing site based out of Silicon Valley - do you think my post about what Flickr video means to the rest of the industry would have gone relatively unnoticed by the online press?  I doubt it.  Do I think my post should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justjason</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-148640</link>
		<dc:creator>justjason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-148640</guid>
		<description>I fully agree that the crumbs will fall, because I don't think people will pay to upload short-form video when there are an excess of free alternatives that do almost everything better. This is not great for Flickr, it will show the distinct short-comings this new service has especially to those who are active on other video sharing sites.

Flickr will always be arguably the best photo sharing site on the Internet. I'm more interested in how they market this and how they intend to grow the service. Will Flickr be a photo-sharing service that does video, or a multimedia-sharing service? I'm always reminded of that old adage/cliche, "Go Big or Go Home!" I don't think Flickr went big enough, and they needed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree that the crumbs will fall, because I don&#8217;t think people will pay to upload short-form video when there are an excess of free alternatives that do almost everything better. This is not great for Flickr, it will show the distinct short-comings this new service has especially to those who are active on other video sharing sites.</p>
<p>Flickr will always be arguably the best photo sharing site on the Internet. I&#8217;m more interested in how they market this and how they intend to grow the service. Will Flickr be a photo-sharing service that does video, or a multimedia-sharing service? I&#8217;m always reminded of that old adage/cliche, &#8220;Go Big or Go Home!&#8221; I don&#8217;t think Flickr went big enough, and they needed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-148480</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-148480</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you regarding Flickr saving themselves a lot of headache buy limiting both the file size and duration.  With that being said, I think the type of videos that you'll see uploaded on Flickr  will be the "artsy" time-lapse videos or something that will compliment their photos.  Maybe short how to video on how they got the shot,  Camera settings, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you regarding Flickr saving themselves a lot of headache buy limiting both the file size and duration.  With that being said, I think the type of videos that you&#8217;ll see uploaded on Flickr  will be the &#8220;artsy&#8221; time-lapse videos or something that will compliment their photos.  Maybe short how to video on how they got the shot,  Camera settings, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Devroe</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-148394</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-148394</guid>
		<description>Chris, and umm, Chris: Yes, Viddler has extensive privacy options for sharing.  Including &lt;a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/113" rel="nofollow"&gt;friends and family only&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/107" rel="nofollow"&gt;secret URL&lt;/a&gt;, unlimited &lt;a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/114" rel="nofollow"&gt;buddy lists&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/211" rel="nofollow"&gt;private embedding&lt;/a&gt;.

If there is anything missing, that anyone thinks we should add, please let us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, and umm, Chris: Yes, Viddler has extensive privacy options for sharing.  Including <a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/113" rel="nofollow">friends and family only</a>, <a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/107" rel="nofollow">secret URL</a>, unlimited <a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/114" rel="nofollow">buddy lists</a>, and <a href="http://www.viddler.com/groups/faq/discuss/211" rel="nofollow">private embedding</a>.</p>
<p>If there is anything missing, that anyone thinks we should add, please let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisClark</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-148389</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-148389</guid>
		<description>Chris, I believe Viddler has comparable Family/Friend permissions built-in as well. I haven't checked out Flickr's to see how extensive they are, but I know that I can limit my Viddler vids' accessibility by family/friend criteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I believe Viddler has comparable Family/Friend permissions built-in as well. I haven&#8217;t checked out Flickr&#8217;s to see how extensive they are, but I know that I can limit my Viddler vids&#8217; accessibility by family/friend criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrison</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-148374</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-148374</guid>
		<description>I've got a Flickr Pro acct and this change impacts me very little. To me Flickr is and will always be a photo site. The video stuff is just an extra feature I probably will not utilize. Sites like Viddler, Vimeo, YouTube, etc. do it better. The one thing Flickr has in its favor, and I think I heard Dan Benjamin say this &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/danbenjamin/statuses/788857319" rel="nofollow"&gt;via Twitter&lt;/a&gt;... is the Family/Friend permissions already built-in. But, honestly, that's not enough for me to use it exclusively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a Flickr Pro acct and this change impacts me very little. To me Flickr is and will always be a photo site. The video stuff is just an extra feature I probably will not utilize. Sites like Viddler, Vimeo, YouTube, etc. do it better. The one thing Flickr has in its favor, and I think I heard Dan Benjamin say this <a href="http://twitter.com/danbenjamin/statuses/788857319" rel="nofollow">via Twitter</a>&#8230; is the Family/Friend permissions already built-in. But, honestly, that&#8217;s not enough for me to use it exclusively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Viddler Spotlight &#187; iJustine Addresses Flickr Video</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-148369</link>
		<dc:creator>The Viddler Spotlight &#187; iJustine Addresses Flickr Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-148369</guid>
		<description>[...] Since the announcement, many Flickr users have gone completely crazy with protest and many people have asked those of us at Viddler what it will mean for us now that Flickr is offering video. Justine hilariously sums up my exact thoughts on the new announcement, and Colin has also written a well-thought-out response on his blog that describes Viddler&#8217;s reacti.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since the announcement, many Flickr users have gone completely crazy with protest and many people have asked those of us at Viddler what it will mean for us now that Flickr is offering video. Justine hilariously sums up my exact thoughts on the new announcement, and Colin has also written a well-thought-out response on his blog that describes Viddler&#8217;s reacti&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Christopher</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/flickr-video-analysis/#comment-148366</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=605#comment-148366</guid>
		<description>Colin, I've got to agree with you across the board here. I think Flickr video is a great addition to (currently Pro) members. It's going to whet the appetite of many Flickr users not only to maybe go Pro on Flickr, but also expose them to the world of online video. They're not stepping on the toes of any current services with their unique limitations, and all in all I think it was a good move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin, I&#8217;ve got to agree with you across the board here. I think Flickr video is a great addition to (currently Pro) members. It&#8217;s going to whet the appetite of many Flickr users not only to maybe go Pro on Flickr, but also expose them to the world of online video. They&#8217;re not stepping on the toes of any current services with their unique limitations, and all in all I think it was a good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
