<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are feeds really like a time machine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/notes/feed-definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/feed-definition/</link>
	<description>The official Web site of Colin Devroe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin Devroe</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/feed-definition/#comment-75429</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/feed-definition/#comment-75429</guid>
		<description>Eric: Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment, I really appreciate it.

About defining something based on its benefit; I think that adds a ton of value and I think we could do some experiments to see how people react and how much soaks in.  Perhaps I&#039;ll now pitch feeds to people as: &quot;Whenever a web site is updated it notifies you and it saves you the time of needing to visit it yourself. Like getting a new email.&quot;

I&#039;m going to see how this works and update this thread here.  Again, thanks for stopping by - and consider me subscribed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://galaxyofemptiness.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;your site&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe we&#039;ll meet up someday at a conference or something and can continue the conversation a bit.

I&#039;m looking forward to checking future versions of Bloglines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric: Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment, I really appreciate it.</p>
<p>About defining something based on its benefit; I think that adds a ton of value and I think we could do some experiments to see how people react and how much soaks in.  Perhaps I&#8217;ll now pitch feeds to people as: &#8220;Whenever a web site is updated it notifies you and it saves you the time of needing to visit it yourself. Like getting a new email.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to see how this works and update this thread here.  Again, thanks for stopping by &#8211; and consider me subscribed to <a href="http://galaxyofemptiness.com/" rel="nofollow">your site</a>. Maybe we&#8217;ll meet up someday at a conference or something and can continue the conversation a bit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to checking future versions of Bloglines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Engleman</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/notes/feed-definition/#comment-75428</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Engleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/notes/feed-definition/#comment-75428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you liked the interview.  I like your critiques and comments.  I also like your definition for a feed reader.  Building the future is fun.  Then you need to describe it to people.  That can be hard. 

A couple of things. I hope I don&#039;t sound pedantic or whatever.  But you got me inspired.

 I would recommend thinking about the benefit.  There are features and there are benefits.  Product definitions are usually feature driven.  But consumers think in terms of benefits.  What&#039;s in it for me.    For example, a car comes with seatbelts and other safety features, but Volvo doesn&#039;t just say...with passenger side-airbags.  Volvo says, a way to protect loved ones.  So in the case of a feed reader, saving time is a big benefit.  There are others. 

Also,  sometimes definitions don&#039;t need to be dictionary definitions.  In conversation, other options include a definition as a joke, a story or even another question.   In conversation, you can rely upon interaction to advance the argument.  Somewhat like Aristotle.     Every time I a do a traditional definition, non-techies get bored.  When I do the time travel device, their eyes light up.  Who doesn&#039;t want to have a time travel machine?  Now you can&#039;t do that with everyone, or they&#039;ll think you&#039;re making fun of them.  Because we all know that time machines exist (or do they?)

Now here&#039;s the test.  Try your definition with a few people.  Then try your definition with a benefit.  Did the benefit help?   Then try the space/time travel device definition.  Let&#039;s see how people react.  Put your answers on your blog.  I&#039;ll do the same tests with your definition without and without the benefit.  I&#039;m at Galaxyofemptiness.com.  Or you can wait you&#039;ll see the outcome on Bloglines.com. Redesigning our site. ;-)

Colin - You&#039;re so right on about the internet set-up experience.  I worked on getting content to people during the internet sign-up while at EarthLink and Yahoo!.   Eliminating the learning curve has a huge impact.   ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you liked the interview.  I like your critiques and comments.  I also like your definition for a feed reader.  Building the future is fun.  Then you need to describe it to people.  That can be hard. </p>
<p>A couple of things. I hope I don&#8217;t sound pedantic or whatever.  But you got me inspired.</p>
<p> I would recommend thinking about the benefit.  There are features and there are benefits.  Product definitions are usually feature driven.  But consumers think in terms of benefits.  What&#8217;s in it for me.    For example, a car comes with seatbelts and other safety features, but Volvo doesn&#8217;t just say&#8230;with passenger side-airbags.  Volvo says, a way to protect loved ones.  So in the case of a feed reader, saving time is a big benefit.  There are others. </p>
<p>Also,  sometimes definitions don&#8217;t need to be dictionary definitions.  In conversation, other options include a definition as a joke, a story or even another question.   In conversation, you can rely upon interaction to advance the argument.  Somewhat like Aristotle.     Every time I a do a traditional definition, non-techies get bored.  When I do the time travel device, their eyes light up.  Who doesn&#8217;t want to have a time travel machine?  Now you can&#8217;t do that with everyone, or they&#8217;ll think you&#8217;re making fun of them.  Because we all know that time machines exist (or do they?)</p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s the test.  Try your definition with a few people.  Then try your definition with a benefit.  Did the benefit help?   Then try the space/time travel device definition.  Let&#8217;s see how people react.  Put your answers on your blog.  I&#8217;ll do the same tests with your definition without and without the benefit.  I&#8217;m at Galaxyofemptiness.com.  Or you can wait you&#8217;ll see the outcome on Bloglines.com. Redesigning our site. <img src='http://cdevroe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Colin &#8211; You&#8217;re so right on about the internet set-up experience.  I worked on getting content to people during the internet sign-up while at EarthLink and Yahoo!.   Eliminating the learning curve has a huge impact.   <img src='http://cdevroe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
