<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is WordPress&#8217; licensing too strict?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/links/wordpress-habari-licensing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/wordpress-habari-licensing/</link>
	<description>by Colin Devroe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/wordpress-habari-licensing/#comment-218624</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1101#comment-218624</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  There is nothing wrong with the GPL.  It&#039;s very altruistic, and that&#039;s a good thing to be.

It nonetheless virtually ensures that any downstream value in the sale of a theme or plugin is lost to its original developer.  Meanwhile, Habari&#039;s use of the Apache license assures freedom for both the user and for the developer.

Thanks for plugging my post, Colin.  I do think this issue is an important one, even outside of Habari, for protecting the rights of artists and developers who don&#039;t dwell on these legalities.

By the way, I don&#039;t &quot;lead&quot; Habari, I&#039;m just one of the guys on a management team that anyone can work to be a part of -- another important distinction between Habari and WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  There is nothing wrong with the GPL.  It&#8217;s very altruistic, and that&#8217;s a good thing to be.</p>
<p>It nonetheless virtually ensures that any downstream value in the sale of a theme or plugin is lost to its original developer.  Meanwhile, Habari&#8217;s use of the Apache license assures freedom for both the user and for the developer.</p>
<p>Thanks for plugging my post, Colin.  I do think this issue is an important one, even outside of Habari, for protecting the rights of artists and developers who don&#8217;t dwell on these legalities.</p>
<p>By the way, I don&#8217;t &#8220;lead&#8221; Habari, I&#8217;m just one of the guys on a management team that anyone can work to be a part of &#8212; another important distinction between Habari and WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/wordpress-habari-licensing/#comment-218573</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1101#comment-218573</guid>
		<description>The GPL is the most popular Open Source license in the world:

http://www.blackducksoftware.com/oss

It&#039;s about 1771% more popular than the Apache license. Open Source seems to be doing okay.

In my opinion, the GPL is the most moral license available as well, which is why I&#039;m such a strong advocate of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GPL is the most popular Open Source license in the world:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blackducksoftware.com/oss" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackducksoftware.com/oss</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s about 1771% more popular than the Apache license. Open Source seems to be doing okay.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the GPL is the most moral license available as well, which is why I&#8217;m such a strong advocate of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skippy</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/wordpress-habari-licensing/#comment-218557</link>
		<dc:creator>skippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1101#comment-218557</guid>
		<description>glibc is released under the LGPL, which specifically permits derivative works to make use of its functionality without &quot;tainting&quot; the derivative works&#039; licensing.  See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_C_Library

GPL contains the viral licensing stipulation, and WordPress&#039; use of the GPL license means that derivative works that are released are obligated to be licensed with a GPL-compatible license.  Derivative works you make but don&#039;t release can be licensed however you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glibc is released under the LGPL, which specifically permits derivative works to make use of its functionality without &#8220;tainting&#8221; the derivative works&#8217; licensing.  See: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_C_Library" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_C_Library</a></p>
<p>GPL contains the viral licensing stipulation, and WordPress&#8217; use of the GPL license means that derivative works that are released are obligated to be licensed with a GPL-compatible license.  Derivative works you make but don&#8217;t release can be licensed however you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Crowley</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/wordpress-habari-licensing/#comment-218535</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=1101#comment-218535</guid>
		<description>I think this might be a bit of fearmongering.  Those Wordpress functions used in your theme or plugin are API functions you&#039;re taking at face value, not unlike apps that use glibc on Linux or the Win32 API on Windows.  Those applications are licensed separately from the platform on which they run - why is the Wordpress case any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this might be a bit of fearmongering.  Those WordPress functions used in your theme or plugin are API functions you&#8217;re taking at face value, not unlike apps that use glibc on Linux or the Win32 API on Windows.  Those applications are licensed separately from the platform on which they run &#8211; why is the WordPress case any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

