<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr isn&#8217;t as big as you may think it is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/links/the-size-of-flickr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/the-size-of-flickr/</link>
	<description>The official Web site of Colin Devroe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin Devroe</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/the-size-of-flickr/#comment-308565</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Devroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=2005#comment-308565</guid>
		<description>It may be unfair to compare the sites, you&#039;re right. I didn&#039;t mean to compare them either, really, I more wanted to show that I have run into the situation many times where people think Flickr is #1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be unfair to compare the sites, you&#8217;re right. I didn&#8217;t mean to compare them either, really, I more wanted to show that I have run into the situation many times where people think Flickr is #1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisrunoff</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/the-size-of-flickr/#comment-307550</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisrunoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=2005#comment-307550</guid>
		<description>This was a real surprise to me. I&#039;ve been on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/azdodsons/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flickr&lt;/a&gt; since late 2005 and have never really spent much time at any of the other available sites. 

The real attraction to Flickr is definitely the community nature of the site. It&#039;s not just a photo repository like ImageShack.

Today was the first time I&#039;ve ever looked at image shack and I doubt I&#039;ll ever return. Perhaps that&#039;s a little unfair, the two sites are really completely different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a real surprise to me. I&#8217;ve been on <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/azdodsons/" rel="nofollow">Flickr</a> since late 2005 and have never really spent much time at any of the other available sites. </p>
<p>The real attraction to Flickr is definitely the community nature of the site. It&#8217;s not just a photo repository like ImageShack.</p>
<p>Today was the first time I&#8217;ve ever looked at image shack and I doubt I&#8217;ll ever return. Perhaps that&#8217;s a little unfair, the two sites are really completely different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
