<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A 70-minute video review of The Phantom Menace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdevroe.com/links/70min-review-tpm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/70min-review-tpm/</link>
	<description>By Colin Devroe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Christopher Clark</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/70min-review-tpm/#comment-358355</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Christopher Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3382#comment-358355</guid>
		<description>This video is amazing. Chris makes a good point about how, though it appears he is rambling, the reviewer makes awesome points. I actually think that it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;because&lt;/i&gt; of the way he delivers the review that it is so effective. His delivery is, I think, meant to imply that any idiot who spent a few minutes thinking about TPM could come to these same conclusions (although maybe not as perfectly as he does). And I think what we gain from that is...

Oh, man: I&#039;m reviewing a review. I need to stop before I get any more meta than I already am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video is amazing. Chris makes a good point about how, though it appears he is rambling, the reviewer makes awesome points. I actually think that it&#8217;s <i>because</i> of the way he delivers the review that it is so effective. His delivery is, I think, meant to imply that any idiot who spent a few minutes thinking about TPM could come to these same conclusions (although maybe not as perfectly as he does). And I think what we gain from that is&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, man: I&#8217;m reviewing a review. I need to stop before I get any more meta than I already am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cdevroe.com/links/70min-review-tpm/#comment-358291</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdevroe.com/?p=3382#comment-358291</guid>
		<description>I watched this on Saturday and agree, it was one of the best reviews I&#039;ve seen to date. It looks like the guy is rambling on but he makes some awesome points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched this on Saturday and agree, it was one of the best reviews I&#8217;ve seen to date. It looks like the guy is rambling on but he makes some awesome points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
