@dgreene196 Yeah, my “no weight” was just an offhand shortcut for what I took as very minimal—but I suppose in matters of science, it’s important to be precise 😉

Many of the references are meta-analyses the group put together that are being published in the same journal this month. So, essentially, you can’t even interpret the data without reading other articles because there isn’t any actual data in the article.

But, yikes, that sounds like there really was no way the article should have been promoted as reversing the call on red meat, which seems to be the way that mainstream media understood it 🙁